This will in reality never be a problem with so it construction; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife out-of Malise

Concerning Comyn daughter who had been wife regarding Malise away from Strathearn, I had theorized during the 2005 that she was in fact Margaret, defined as wife regarding Sir John de- Keith (look for content off post below) who was simply 2ndly e are given where post: the latest partner Emma I will suggest is of another family relations, and not mom of the second Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl away from Buchan_ , says in part, ‘Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn, got a spouse Emma, for the 1261-1267, whoever surname is not familiar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. regarding Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a while just before 1270, so as that his widow (Margaret) could have been “available” a while shortly after Emma.

This was naturally a speculation; it does feel the benefit of dealing with a known dating ranging from Muriel Keith and Reginald le Cheyne. Any longer related files would obviously be acceptance.

This new account into the Scots Peerage concerning category of Keith claims off Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) which he was considered possess hitched Comyn, earl away from Buchan . This identity, of your undecided (“thought to had been”) diversity, are now able to getting remedied in accordance with the following dispensation, dated from the Fondi with the fourteen The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty To the bishop away from Moray. Faculty to distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, off Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, on the impediment so you can relationships arising from the next and you will 4th amounts of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the near future second partner away from Robert Stewart, first Duke from Albany (d. 1420), are contracted to help you wed Reginald le Cheyne, young man of Sir Reginald ce Cheyne by his partner (due to the fact their own very first spouse), Helen out-of Strathearn. Whenever you are there are known openings regarding origins off Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald ce Cheyne do display an ancestry throughout the Comyns. not, this will be also distant to need an effective dispensation in the event that Muriel is a-great-great grandd Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1233), which could be the instance if is why child.

https://kissbrides.com/american-women/salem-ma/

2. Reginald le Cheyne is actually an excellent-grandson away from Marjory Comyn, daughter of Alexander Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1290), son from William Comyn mentioned above. Their unique child is actually Malise, Earl of Strathearn off 1312 so you’re able to their dying into the 1328 , and you will father off Reginald.

ca. 1270), was same as Marjory Comyn, and you will hitched 2ndly so you can Malise, Earl of Strathearn (d. 1312). This should indicate new parentage a€?said to provides been’ compared to Margaret, partner away from Sir John de- Keith, is actually from that generation: she’d n’t have already been the latest d Comyn, Earl of Buchan, but alternatively out-of his son Alexander. There isn’t any evidence one to Earl Malise and Marjory Comyn was basically partnered much prior to 1275: because the Lindsay typed,

There is certainly you to discernable foundation about what the relationship ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you will Muriel Keith would have resided: in the event the Margaret Comyn, spouse off Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The fresh spouse associated with earl, regarding 1275, are named Marjory, while we understand the attesting clause of Zero. cv., that’s stated from the Wyntoun, Guide VIII. chap. vi., to possess been the following sibling off John Comyn, Earl of Buchan, who negotiated on the part of Earl Malise the wedding settlement above stated [dated from the London area, April twenty-six, 1293 to possess their daughter Matilda and Robert de- Tony, young man out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de Quincy Elizabeth away from Buchan I __________________I________________ I III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als We E regarding Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We We I I I I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Elizabeth from = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony We ______I_______________________ We We We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de E out-of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 I ce Cheyne We We We = 2) Sir David I V We We de- Graham Sir William de I We__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III We I We We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke from Albany)